Addressing Heat Stress and Mycotoxin Challenges

Heat stress presents a significant challenge to the beef and dairy cattle industries, negatively affecting both animal welfare and productivity (Lacetera et al., 2019; Ríus et al., 2022). As temperatures rise, cattle are increasingly exposed to harmful conditions that can impair their health and performance. This problem is exacerbated when heat stress is combined with other stressors, such as mycotoxin exposure, leading to even greater negative impacts. This article explores the effects of heat stress, the role of mycotoxins, their combined effects, and potential mitigation strategies for sustainable livestock management.

Heat Stress in Cattle

Heat stress occurs when cattle are unable to effectively dissipate body heat, leading to elevated body temperatures and a range of physiological disruptions (Becker et al., 2020). This condition is particularly prevalent during the summer, with high daytime temperatures and inadequate nighttime cooling exacerbating the problem. According to Wickramasinghe et al. (2023), heat stress significantly elevates rectal and skin temperatures and increases respiration rates in cattle, indicating severe hyperthermia.

A relevant consequence of heat stress is reduced dry matter intake (DMI), as cattle instinctively consume less feed to minimize metabolic heat production (Collier et al., 2017; Al-Qaisi et al., 2020). This reduction in DMI can translate to decreased average daily gain (ADG) and overall poor growth performance. Furthermore, heat stress triggers physiological adjustments, such as increased peripheral blood flow, leading to hypoxia in the intestinal epithelium and subsequent oxidative stress and inflammation (Lambert et al., 2002; Lambert et al., 2004; Lian et al., 2021). Inflammation and the resulting immune system response have been demonstrated to redirect nutrients away from milk production in dairy cows (Baumgard et al., 2017).

Mycotoxins: Hidden Threats

Mycotoxins, toxic compounds produced by certain types of fungi, present another significant challenge in cattle management (Akande et al., 2006). Commonly found in contaminated feed, mycotoxins can cause a range of adverse effects, including immunosuppression, liver damage, and gastrointestinal disturbances (Yang et al., 2020). With chronic exposure, long-term health issues and decreased productivity can occur.

When combined with heat stress, the effects of mycotoxins can be amplified. Heat-stressed cattle already face compromised immune function and increased oxidative stress, which can exacerbate the detrimental effects of mycotoxins. This compounding stress can lead to a vicious cycle of declining health and productivity, underscoring the need for proactive management strategies.

Phytogenic Feed Additives: A Promising Solution

Phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) have emerged as a promising solution to mitigate the effects of both heat stress and mycotoxin exposure in livestock. Derived from plant-based bioactive compounds, PFAs are known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties (Ramirez et al., 2021). These additives can alleviate oxidative stress and inflammation in heat-stressed cattle, improving their overall health and resilience (Wickramasinghe et al., 2023).

Research has demonstrated that PFAs significantly improve the average daily gain (ADG) in young calves (Schieder et al., 2014; Akbarian-Tefaghi et al., 2018) and in finishing steers (Brand et al., 2019). Additionally, it has effectively lowered blood lipopolysaccharide (LPS) levels in cows experiencing acidosis (Humer et al., 2018).

PFAs improve the intestinal barrier and reduce inflammation in stressed animals. A higher dosage of 150 mg/kg, compared to the standard 50 mg/kg, significantly increases body weight in feedlot cattle (Bachinger et al., 2019; Piran Filho et al., 2021).

Moreover, PFAs significantly reduce markers of inflammation and oxidative stress. Serum haptoglobin and plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) concentrations were found to be 44% and 38% lower, respectively, in calves fed PFAs compared to controls. PFAs also reduced protein carbonyl and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) concentrations during the first day of heat stress, suggesting protection against acute oxidative damage (Wickramasinghe et al., 2023).

Compounding Stress: The Combined Impact of Heat and Mycotoxins

The interaction between heat stress and mycotoxin exposure presents a complex challenge for cattle producers. Both stressors independently impair immune function and promote oxidative stress, but their combined effects can be especially detrimental. Heat stress can enhance the absorption and toxicity of mycotoxins by compromising gut barrier function, while mycotoxins can exacerbate the physiological strain of heat stress.

Managing this compounding stress requires a multifaceted approach. Environmental management strategies, such as providing adequate shade, ventilation, and cooling systems, significantly mitigate the negative impacts on cattle. Additionally, incorporating dietary interventions like PFAs into cattle diets can enhance feed intake and protect against oxidative stress and inflammation (Chauhan et al., 2021). Regularly monitoring mycotoxin levels in feed and using mycotoxin binders when necessary is also crucial. Combining these dietary interventions with environmental modifications offers a holistic approach to managing heat stress and mycotoxin exposure.

Conclusion

Heat stress and mycotoxin exposure significantly challenge the beef and dairy cattle industries, negatively impacting cattle health and productivity. Phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) mitigate oxidative stress and inflammation, enhancing cattle resilience under stressful conditions. As the industry faces climate change and feed contamination, integrating PFAs with environmental modifications is crucial for sustainable livestock production. Producers can improve cattle welfare and performance by addressing heat stress and mycotoxin exposure, ensuring the industry's more resilient and productive future.

References

  1. Akande, K. E., Abubakar, M. M., Adegbola, T. A., & Bogoro, S. E. (2006). Nutritional and health implications of mycotoxins in animal feeds: A review. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 5(5), 398-403.
  2. Akbarian-Tefaghi, M., E. Ghasemi, and M. Khorvash. 2018. Performance, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites of dairy calves fed starter mixtures supplemented with herbal plants, essential oils or monensin. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 102:630–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12842.
  3. Al-Qaisi, M., E. A. Horst, S. K. Kvidera, C. S. McCarthy, E. J. Mayorga, M. A. Abeyta, B. Goetz, N. C. Upah, D. M. McKilligan, B. W. Kolstad, L. L. Timms, and L. H. Baumgard. 2020. Effects of dietary electrolytes, osmolytes, and energetic compounds on body temperature indices in heat-stressed lactating cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 132:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.05.012.
  4. Bachinger, D., E. Mayer, T. Kaschubek, C. Schieder, J. König, and K. Teichmann. 2019. Influence of phytogenics on recovery of the barrier function of intestinal porcine epithelial cells after a calcium switch. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.) 103:210–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12997
  5. Baumgard, L. H., Collier, R. J., & Bauman, D. E. (2017). A 100-year review: Regulation of nutrient partitioning to support lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(12), 10353-10366. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13242.
  6. Becker, C. A., Collier, R. J., & Stone, A. E. (2020). Invited review: Physiological and behavioral effects of heat stress in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(8), 6751-6770. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17929.
  7. Brand, T., M. Hünerberg, T. A. McAllister, M. He, A. M. Saleem, Y. Shen, B. Miller, and W. Yang. 2019. Impact of a phytogenic feed additive on growth performance, feed intake, and carcass traits of finishing steers. Transl. Anim. Sci. 3:1162–1172. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txz109.
  8. Chauhan, S. S., V. P. Rashamol, M. Bagath, V. Sejian, and F. R. Dunshea. 2021. Impacts of heat stress on immune responses and oxidative stress in farm animals and nutritional strategies for amelioration. Int. J. Biometeorol. 65:1231–1244. https://doi.org/10 .1007/s00484-021-02083-3.
  9. Collier, R. J., B. J. Renquist, and Y. Xiao. 2017. A 100-Year Review: Stress physiology including heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 100:10367– 10380. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13676.
  10. Humer, E., I. Kröger, V. Neubauer, K. Schedle, N. Reisinger, and Q. Zebeli. 2018. Supplementing phytogenic compounds or autolyzed yeast modulates ruminal biogenic amines and plasma metabolome in dry cows experiencing subacute ruminal acidosis. J. Dairy Sci. 101:9559–9574. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14744.
  11. Lacetera, N. 2019. Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare. Anim. Front. 9:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy030.
  12. Lambert, G. P., C. V. Gisolfi, D. J. Berg, P. L. Moseley, L. W. Oberley, and K. C. Kregel. 2002. Selected Contribution: Hyperthermiainduced intestinal permeability and the role of oxidative and nitrosative stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 92:1750–1761. https://doi.org/10 .1152/japplphysiol.00787.2001.
  13. Lambert, G. P. 2004. Role of gastrointestinal permeability in exertional heatstroke. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 32:185–190. https://doi .org/10.1097/00003677-200410000-00011.
  14. Lian, P., S. Braber, S. Varasteh, H. J. Wichers, and G. Folkerts. 2021. Hypoxia and heat stress affect epithelial integrity in a Caco-2/HT29 co-culture. Sci. Rep. 11:13186. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598 -021-92574-5.
  15. Piran Filho, F. A., T. D. Turner, I. Mueller, and J. L. P. Daniel. 2021. Influence of Phytogenic Feed Additive on Performance of Feedlot Cattle. Front. Anim. Sci. 2:767034. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim .2021.767034.
  16. Ramirez, S. M., Wickramasinghe, J., Stepanchenko, N., Oconitrillo, M., Silva, J., Goetz, B. M., Abeyta, M. A., Murugesan, R., Tacconia, A., Baumgard, L. H., & Appuhamy, R. (2021). Phytogenic feed additives as a potential strategy to mitigate the negative effects of heat stress in growing heifers. Journal of Animal Science, 99(Suppl 3), 156–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab235.288
  17. Ríus, A. G., J. D. Kaufman, M. M. Li, M. D. Hanigan, and I. R. Ipharraguerre. 2022. Physiological responses of Holstein calves to heat stress and dietary supplementation with a postbiotic from Aspergillus oryzae. Sci. Rep. 12:1587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598 -022-05505-3.
  18. Schieder, C., T. Steiner, and M. Friedrichkeit. 2014. Effect of phytogenic feed additives on performance parameters and health of bull calves under commercial conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 92:863–864. (Abstr).
  19. Wickramasinghe, H. K. J. P., Stepanchenko, N., Oconitrillo, M. J., Goetz, B. M., Abeyta, M. A., Gorden, P. J., Baumgard, L. H., & Appuhamy, J. A. D. R. N. (2023). Effects of a phytogenic feed additive on weaned dairy heifer calves subjected to a diurnal heat stress bout. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(9), 6114-6127. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22856
  20. Yang, C., Song, G., & Lim, W. (2020). Effects of mycotoxin-contaminated feed on farm animals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 389, 122087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122087

Published on

15 July 2024

Tags

  • Ruminants
  • Mycotoxins
  • Eubiotics
  • Phytogenics

Related Articles

  • Boosting Lifetime Performance with Phytogenic Feed Additives

    Boosting Lifetime Performance with Phytogenic Feed Additives

    20 May 2024

    In the ever-evolving landscape of animal nutrition, phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) have emerged as a significant tool for enhancing animal health and performance. These additives are a sophisticated blend of plant-derived compounds designed to optimize livestock productivity and health. Extensive research and trials underscore the effectiveness of phytogenic feed additives. Studies have demonstrated its ability to improve feed efficiency, enhance growth rates, and reduce the need for medical treatments, lowering livestock management's overall cost. The trials, conducted under various farm conditions and with different animal groups, have consistently shown improvements in weight gain, feed intake, and overall health.

  • Mycotoxins Effects on Feedlot Cattle Performance

    Mycotoxins Effects on Feedlot Cattle Performance

    18 Sep 2023

    Evaluating the negative effects associated with mycotoxins on feedlot performance and health needs further investigation. In general, it is widely believed that feedlot animals are more resistant to development of mycotoxicosis compared to other species due to natural deactivation properties in the rumen. Research in both dairy and beef have shown that while ruminants are able to consume a higher concentration of mycotoxins compared to other livestock species such as swine and poultry, cattle are not any less susceptible to negative effects on health and performance from mycotoxins.

  • Heat Stress

    Heat Stress

    20 Jun 2022

    Summer months in many U.S. regions bring higher temperatures and increased risk of heat stress in dairy and beef animals. Heat stress becomes a risk when cattle generate and absorb more heat than they are able to dissipate. Dairy and beef cattle generate heat during digestion, therefore, high producing animals that eat more may be at greater risk during times when environmental conditions favor heat stress. In addition, cattle also absorb heat through solar radiation when outdoors and black hided cattle pose a greater risk of death loss during heat wave events compared to other hide colors. Heavy finished cattle with greater fat deposition have a harder time regulating heat effectively and can succumb to heat stress easier than light weight cattle. Compared to other species, cattle don’t effectively dissipate heat and rely primarily on respiration to cool themselves. When heat load accumulates throughout the day, cattle must rely on cooler temperatures in the evening hours to effectively cool their core body temperature to a safe range. During severe heat waves when temperatures remain high and animals generate accumulated heat load, other effective heat stress mitigation strategies should be implemented.

Share

You are being redirected.

We detected that you are visitng this page from United States. Therefore we are redirecting you to the localized version.