-
Global/EN
- Global
- North America
- Latin America
A recent (2023) market analysis report expects the global shrimp market to reach from US$ 46.94 Billion in 2022 to US$ 69.35 Billion by 2028 (1). This growth will primarily come from Litopenaeus vannamei (Pacific white shrimp) which currently makes up >50% of production volume, followed by Peneaus monodon (black tiger shrimp) (1). Produced across Asia-Pacific (India, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Bangladesh, Malaysia), China and Latin America (Ecuador), shrimp is a global commodity, providing an important protein source for human consumption and essential vitamins and trace elements. Regardless of production country, a major bottleneck for further expansion is the widespread occurrence of disease, as well as shrimp`s sensitivity to environmental fluctuations and stressors. A robust shrimp will be less susceptible to disease and environmental stressors.
Like all living animals, shrimp have a requirement for certain nutrients, including amino-acids, cholesterol, vitamins, and minerals. Although dietary formulations vary depending on raw material availability, price, and developmental stage, typically one can expect 25 - >40% crude protein, 6-12% crude lipid (2) as well as essential micro-nutrients. For vitamin recommendations, dsm-firmenich has developed Optimum Vitamin Nutrition® guidelines. An example of a typical shrimp diet is given in Table 1.
Raw material | Inclusion (%) |
Fish meal, SE Asia, 60% CP | 15 |
Poultry meal, 58% CP | 18.44 |
Soybean meal, Brazil, 45% CP | 12.13 |
Wheat, flour | 28.124 |
Mineral premix | 1 |
Vitamin premix | 0.33 |
Shrimp head meal | 2.38 |
Vitamin C, Stay C | 0.006 |
Wheat gluten meal, 70% CP | 2.5 |
DL-Methionine | 0.049 |
Attractant | 1 |
Soy lecithin | 1.68 |
Fish solubles, dehydrated, 40% CP | 1 |
Fish meal, SE Asia, 64% CP | 5 |
Soy protein concentrate, 60% CP | 10 |
Mycotoxin binder, Mycofix | 0.1 |
L-Taurine | 0.014 |
Blood meal, whole, spray-dried | 0.6 |
Fish oil, mackerel | 0.66 |
From a macro-ingredient perspective, shrimp feeds are following the global trend to reduce reliance on marine ingredients, often through increased usage of plant-based raw materials.
Plant proteins, while they can significantly boost overall protein content, come with potential drawbacks. Even when diets are carefully balanced to address amino acid limitations, incorporating more plant-based ingredients raises the risk of introducing undesirable contaminants, which can adversely affect the health and performance of shrimp. These contaminants may consist of anti-nutritional factors (ANFs), such as mycotoxins.
Although mycotoxin effects have been extensively investigated in land-based animals, there is a notable scarcity of research, particularly in the context of aquaculture, specifically regarding shrimp. Unlike terrestrial animals, aquatic species seldom exhibit obvious clinical symptoms as a result of mycotoxin contamination. Instead, they are more commonly subjected to prolonged exposure to moderate levels of mycotoxins, which is known as chronic exposure. This chronic exposure can lead to non-specific consequences, such as reduced performance (slower growth, higher feed conversion ratios), increased susceptibility to diseases, and elevated healthcare costs. However, these subtle effects are often overlooked or not attributed to the presence of mycotoxins.
The hepatopancreas is the main site for nutrient metabolism and detoxification of xenobiotics in crustaceans. Several studies show detrimental effects of mycotoxins on this organ as changes in histology or lesions (Table 2). Detrimental effects on this organ may influence nutrient metabolism and decrease energy of animals to gain weight and deal with other stress factors. The hepatopancreas is the site of hemocyte production, maturation, specialization, and release. Immunologic function in shrimp largely relies on the activity of these hemocytes: cells carrying out numerous functions including phagocytosis and recognition of pathogens. If the health of the hepatopancreas is compromised so might be the immune system (3).
In shrimps, most studies have been conducted with Afla B1, the most toxic and carcinogenic mycotoxin.
White-leg shrimp | Black-tiger shrimp | |
Afla B1 | Abnormal development hepatopancreas, tissue changes and lesions, changes in haemolymph, but also: decreased weight gain, increased mortality (4), (5), (6), (7)
High variation in sensitivity between studies:
| Abnormal development hepatopancreas, tissue changes and lesions, changes in haemolymph, but also: decreased weight gain, increased mortality (12), (13), (14)
High variation in sensitivity between studies:
|
DON | Histological changes with increasing concentrations (starting with commonly detected 360 ppb) (9)
Also reduced performance observed | Also reduced performance observed (500 ppb; (15)) |
T-2 | Histological changes in hepatopancreatic tubules (high inclusion 2 ppm) (16) | |
ZEN | Histological changes (starting with inclusion of 500 ppb ZEN in diet) (16) | |
FUM | Histological changes with increasing inclusion (starting with commonly detected 500 ppb) (11) |
The shrimp intestine is an important part of the immune system as the first barrier between the body and toxic entities. Peer-reviewed publications show that several mycotoxins do impact intestinal structure and immune system. Some recent studies focused on the expression of genes important for the immune system, and immune regulation. Table 3 gives a summary of the observed effects.
White-leg shrimp | Black-tiger shrimp | |
Afla B1 | Immunosuppressing mycotoxin (low levels: activation of immune system; high levels: strong weakening and suppression) (17), (8) | Increased susceptibility to disease (14) |
DON | Change in microstructure of intestinal epithelial cells (~500 ppb: fusion of mucosal folds) Impairing anti-oxidative defense system and influencing two important immune pathways (NF-κB pathway, proPO system) | |
T-2 | Damage in microstructure of intestine (18) | |
FUM | Influence on immune system (Decreased levels of haematocytes) |
Changes in the intestinal epithelial cells (as shown for e.g. DON and T-2 toxin) might negatively affect nutrient absorption and thus wellbeing and performance of shrimp.
With all these results showing negative effects on the hepatopancreas, intestine, performance, and probably immune system, let`s not forget about final product quality. Possible residues of Afla in shrimp need further exploration ((8): found residues in hepatopancreas but not muscle). One study indicated a possible impact of FUM (fumonisins )-contaminated diet on shrimp muscle texture, which might affect consumer acceptance.
The risk of mycotoxin contamination is never zero! Even with the best quality control procedures, mycotoxins are a constant threat, and therefore a robust mycotoxin risk management program is essential. Part of this is using a mycotoxin deactivator in the feed formulation. Mycofix® is a state-of-the-art mycotoxin deactivator comprising three modes of action for the ultimate insurance policy against a wide range of known, and emerging mycotoxins. Adsorption to bind adsorbable mycotoxins, biotransformation to detoxify non-adsorbable mycotoxins and bioprotection, natural ingredients supporting hepatopancreas, immune system and intestinal barrier.
An in-house trial was performed with white-leg shrimp (initial weight of ~1.325g) over 8 weeks. Survival and performance were evaluated in comparison to a group with the same moderately contaminated diet but also the inclusion (2.5 kg/t) of Mycofix® PRO-tect (combining the adsorption and bioprotection component). Feed was analyzed with the multi-mycotoxin method Spectrum 380®, the most comprehensive analysis method available covering >800 different mycotoxins and fungal/plant- and bacterial metabolites, developed and performed at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (Vienna/Tulln). The feed showed only moderate natural contamination levels of mycotoxins and emerging mycotoxins (DON 12ppb, ZEN 13 ppb, Beauvericin 2.8ppb, Enniatin B 1.6ppb and Enniatin B1 2.7 ppb as well as moderate levels of other Fusarium metabolites) (see Table 4).
TOXIN / METABOLITE | VALUE (ppb) |
Bacterial metabolites | |
cyclo (L-Pro-L-Val) | 2373.0 |
Depsipeptides | |
BeauvericinE | 2.8 |
Enniatin BE | 2.6 |
Enniatin B1E | 2.7 |
Fusarium metabolites | |
15-Hydroxyculmorin | 39.3 |
CulmorinE | 83.3 |
Epiequisetin | 2.6 |
Equisetin | 6.7 |
Metabolites from other fungi | |
Neoechinulin A | 12.0 |
Penicillium Toxins | |
Flavoglaucin | 15.3 |
Phytoestrogens | |
Daidzein | 17220.0 |
Daidzin | 67740.0 |
Genistein | 29522.1 |
Genistin | 88362.4 |
Glycitein | 9690.4 |
Glycitin | 17631.6 |
Ononin | |
Plant metabolites | |
Abscisic acid | 132.5 |
Trichothecenes | |
DeoxynivalenolM | 12.0 |
Unspecific metabolites | |
Asperglaucide | 360.2 |
Asperphenamate | 60.3 |
Brevianamid F | 537.6 |
cyclo (L-Pro-L-Tyr) | 3711.0 |
Fellutanine A | 42.9 |
N-Benzoyl-Phenylalanine | 22.8 |
Rugulusovin | 50.5 |
Tryptophol | 461.5 |
Neoechinulin D | |
Zearalenone-Derivates | |
ZearalenoneM | 13.2 |
Zearalenone-Sulfate* | detected |
After 56 days, survival and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly improved in the group with the inclusion of Mycofix® PRO-tect compared to the control group (Figure 1a and 1b).
Based on FCR results alone (i.e. excluding survival and performance gains), an economic calculation also showed a very strong return on investment (ROI) and low breakeven (Table 5).
Control | Mycofix® | ||
Revenue from sales | USD | 95000.00 | 95000.00 |
Total feed cost | USD | 27189.00 | 24777.90 |
Revenue - feed cost | 67811.00 | 70222.10 | |
Net income | USD | 2411.10 | |
Net income per animal | USD cents/animal | 0.25 | |
Return on Investment | 15.67 | ||
Breakeven | g/animal | 0.03 |
This trial demonstrates that Mycofix® PRO-tect has clear benefits on the shrimp (improving performance, health and welfare) and also on the business (driving profitability).
Protection and thus improved performance is due to the combination of two components: the mineral adsorbent to efficiently bind adsorbable mycotoxins and the bioprotection mix to support the health and functionality of the hepatopancreas, the immune system, and the gastrointestinal barrier when mycotoxins are present.
These results underline the importance of proper mycotoxin risk management to protect shrimp from the adverse effects of mycotoxins, thus supporting the robustness of shrimp and the profitability of shrimp farming.
09 November 2023
Anneliese Müller is a Global Product Manager for Mycotoxin Risk Management. She studied biology at the University of Vienna and did her PhD in survival mechanisms of foodborne pathogens at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. She is regularly working with and publishing the results of the global dsm-firmenich Mycotoxin Survey.
Benedict Standen is the Head of Aqua Marketing Global at dsm-firmenich Animal Nutrition & Health. He received his PhD from Plymouth University, where his research focus was feed additives in aquaculture.
We detected that you are visitng this page from United States. Therefore we are redirecting you to the localized version.